A major controversy has emerged over alleged irregularities in the allocation of government land in the fast-developing Pedda Shapur area of Shamshabad mandal, located near the state capital. With major infrastructure projects such as a high-speed corridor, a proposed bus terminal, and rapid industrial expansion driving land values sharply upward, the issue involving over 270 acres of government land has triggered concern within revenue circles.
According to official records, approximately 94.73 acres of land in Survey Numbers 172 to 180 in Pedda Shapur is classified as government land. However, private parties have reportedly been staking claims over the property for some time, leading to a prolonged dispute over ownership rights.
The controversy deepened after allegations surfaced that the local tahsildar issued orders independently, allocating the disputed land in favour of a private entity. The proceedings, reportedly issued on February 28, have raised questions within the revenue department, as such decisions typically require approval from senior authorities.
Further concerns have been raised over the alleged involvement of a politically influential cooperative society vice-chairman, who is said to have played a role in facilitating the local-level decisions. Revenue sources suggest that standard procedural checks involving higher authorities such as the Revenue Secretary or the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA) may not have been followed in the case.
The issue has widened after reports indicated that proposals related to an additional 176 acres are also being processed, taking the total disputed land extent significantly higher. Real estate estimates suggest the combined value of the land could exceed ₹1,000 crore, given that rates in the area range between ₹5 crore and ₹8 crore per acre, with earlier HMDA auctions in 2023 recording prices as high as ₹30,000 per square yard.
Meanwhile, allegations have also emerged regarding Survey No. 626/1, where criminal cases are already pending, yet decisions were allegedly taken in favour of private parties. Claims have further been made that non-CS-7 category lands were misclassified to enable approvals.
The Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) is reportedly collecting preliminary information and has questioned the concerned tahsildar regarding the issuance of the orders. Sources indicate that the matter has also reached senior levels of the government, where serious concerns are being expressed over procedural lapses. Legal experts warn that bypassing established norms in government land transactions could lead to significant legal complications, particularly if transactions are executed before final judicial determinations.